another track...please feedback if possible...
http://media.putfile.com/bubles-94
theory-bubles
-
superfreunde
- mnml newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:16 am
hi ,
i think its okay as a tool but reminds me on a record dont know which but it reminds me on one.
will look at my vinyl and tell you .
bye dominik
will look at my vinyl and tell you .
bye dominik
Re: hi ,
you are ritght man...i know the track you are tolking about...i dont know the name...
hmm it's hard to give good feedback about quality, the highs sounded relatively crisp but the lows where kind of lost. Definitive trentemoeller vibe in the beginning. I kinda get the feeling you didn't really know what you wanted the track to do to the listener at all times, and as of that didn't really spend time thinking of the purpose of each segment. I like your fx and so, those are tip top. The track could in my opinion be a killer if it got a shift more towards low freq sounds and made a bit longer with some added clicks, bells or whistle style stuff going on with lots of lots of reverb. But it sure was a nice listen, and I would really like to hear what it sounds like in a 320 kb/s version instead of the putfile stream 
The beginning is great, the bleeps are really peaceful and enjoyable. Then, for a while, nothing happens :-/
Soundwise, it's OK (it's 2 AM, headphones time). There's only one thing I hate: the reverb on the rim shot. It just doesn't fit.
Try various echoes here or there on the bleeps maybe. Those bleeps are the track, really. They have to evolve, those evolutions will be the structure of the track. If they're static, the track is static... Carl is right when he says "you didn't really know what you wanted the track to do to the listener at all times". The listener shouldn't even have to think of "the purpose of each segment", it should be so obvious the listener should just feel it.
Soundwise, it's OK (it's 2 AM, headphones time). There's only one thing I hate: the reverb on the rim shot. It just doesn't fit.
Try various echoes here or there on the bleeps maybe. Those bleeps are the track, really. They have to evolve, those evolutions will be the structure of the track. If they're static, the track is static... Carl is right when he says "you didn't really know what you wanted the track to do to the listener at all times". The listener shouldn't even have to think of "the purpose of each segment", it should be so obvious the listener should just feel it.
:.: : :: : :.: .:. :.
