[WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

- wax
Post Reply
breton
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 857
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:58 am

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by breton »

R40UL wrote:for those who care:
Nobody cares.
Top
Igloobs
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:09 pm

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by Igloobs »

ahahahah
Top
jespermygind
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 629
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:08 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by jespermygind »

unnecessary
Top
R40UL
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 132
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:50 am

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by R40UL »

yup. thats what I thought, haha :D
dunno how I came up with this idea.
I need to get some sleep I guess.
Top
User avatar
soapz
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: Always within reach.. currently Australia

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by soapz »

breton wrote:I wish he kept them vinyl only.
Why? So less people could play his music?
Top
breton
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 857
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:58 am

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by breton »

soapz wrote:
breton wrote:I wish he kept them vinyl only.
Why? So less people could play his music?
I don't mind anyone (Shed in particular) selling thousands of copies of a record. I just hate* digital, that is all.

*'hate' may be too strong a word.

edited to make my point more clear
Top
Papa Bear
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:15 pm

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by Papa Bear »

breton wrote:
soapz wrote:
breton wrote:I wish he kept them vinyl only.
Why? So less people could play his music?
I don't mind anyone (Shed in particular) selling thousands of copies of a record. I just hate* digital, that is all.

*'hate' may be too strong a word.

edited to make my point more clear
Digital has its positive sides too. Not everyone can afford to pay 10 quid per every new track that comes out these days. Also, there are a lot of older releases that have been rendered impossible to buy on vinyl due to hype and ridiculously high prices, but that exist in digital format. And of course, sometimes you get to come across nice gems that only exist as mp3's (there aren't too many of them, but still). So yeah, digital shouldn't be shunned completely.
Top
User avatar
roland
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 1881
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:01 pm
Location: Neubau

Re: [WAX 50005] WAX - No. 50005

Post by roland »

Papa Bear wrote: Digital has its positive sides too. Not everyone can afford to pay 10 quid per every new track that comes out these days. Also, there are a lot of older releases that have been rendered impossible to buy on vinyl due to hype and ridiculously high prices, but that exist in digital format. And of course, sometimes you get to come across nice gems that only exist as mp3's (there aren't too many of them, but still). So yeah, digital shouldn't be shunned completely.
i agree.. except for the "not everyone can afford vinyl" argument..

with vinyl you're sometimes paying more but you always get a lot more too (and a lot more people benefit from it)... see if you buy wav, and a release has more than three tracks digital is even more expensive (which is ridiculous if you think about it)..

two wav files of this wax50005 here would cost you € 5,06 ... i paid € 8,79 for the vinyl..


btw i hope we all agree that playing mp3s and buying single tracks instead of whole releases is not the way to go..
Top
Post Reply

Return to “• vinyl”