personally I don't think it's about either. I feel the real message was about long term investment in the community vs. individuals and PR ppl that could care less on how they affect anything at all. People that have no long term ties with the community, and it's just all about profit and milking a system based on "looks" not substance. I didn't take that article in anyway about pro's vs amateurs or day job vs. full time, but rather people in things for the long hall vs. the dine n dash... it's moved into "online appearance" draw vs. quality, substance, and actual value. and because it gets set back to zero so quickly, for the most part, no one notices...amateur journos, or amateur musicians.
PART-TIME PUNKS: ARE AMATEURS RUINING DANCE MUSIC?
- John Clees
- mnml admn
- Posts: 7715
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:21 am
- Location: walk the e[art]h : detroit-metro.
- Contact:
Re: PART-TIME PUNKS: ARE AMATEURS RUINING DANCE MUSIC?
Re: PART-TIME PUNKS: ARE AMATEURS RUINING DANCE MUSIC?
Thats what its all about for me: Looks vs Substance, the problem is that regular people tend to pay more attention to looks rather than substanceJohn Clees wrote:and it's just all about profit and milking a system based on "looks" not substance. I didn't take that article in anyway about pro's vs amateurs or day job vs. full time, but rather people in things for the long hall vs. the dine n dash... it's moved into "online appearance" draw vs. quality, substance